How good is the latest version of ChatGPT? | BBC News

Just look at the world and tell me it could get worse with ai?

ChatGPT
If you're referring to the British colonial period, the actions of British authorities and policies led to significant loss of life across their empire. Some of the most notable instances include:

1. **Indian Famine Deaths**: British colonial policies contributed to several famines in India, most notably the Bengal Famine of 1943, which resulted in an estimated 2-3 million deaths.

2. **Jallianwala Bagh Massacre (1919)**: British troops, under the command of General Dyer, killed around 379 to 1,000 unarmed Indian civilians in Amritsar.

3. **Boer War Concentration Camps (1899–1902)**: During the Second Boer War in South Africa, over 28,000 Boer civilians, including women and children, died in British-run concentration camps.

4. **Opium Wars and Chinese Famines**: British imperial actions contributed to large-scale suffering and death in China, both through the Opium Wars and policies that exacerbated famines.

5. **Kenya's Mau Mau Uprising (1952-1960)**: British forces were involved in mass detentions, torture, and extrajudicial killings. An estimated 20,000 to 100,000 people were killed.

These are just a few examples, and there are many more instances of violence, oppression, and exploitation during the British Empire's rule, resulting in millions of deaths. Would you like more specific information on any of these events or others?

Instead of big tech multi-billionaires paying more taxes. The government should coordinate with Big tech and develop algorithms to create a universal base income (UBI) based on the use of OUR DATA (the world's greatest commodity) and establish a fair valuation that would compensate us the consumers with rewards, credits, tokens or plain dollars for the use of it by big tech permanent development of marketing strategies that so far only generate billions of dollars for big tech monopolies. Currently, we get nothing in return but sophisticated scientific personalized advertising inciting us to keep consuming only to enlarge the already obscene multi-billion big tech pockets without any financial benefit for the other 98% owners of our data.

Anything better than your garbage propoganda.

AI is software , not real people the future
Personalized Experiences: 9 – Highly likely
Evolution of AI Governance: 9 – Highly likely
Improved Sustainability: 8 – Very likely
Increased Accessibility: 8 – Very likely
Emergence of New Ethical and Legal Frameworks: 8 – Very likely
Slow Growth: 8 – Very likely
AGI & ASI Machine Software Domains: 7 – Likely
Exponential Growth: 6 – Moderately likely
Perpetual Cultural Development: 5 – Somewhat likely
Human Interference: 4 – Less likely
World Catastrophe: 3 – Unlikely
Status Quo: 2 – Very unlikely
New Species Evo

I feel another possible issue is some people may possibly lose their ability to think, if they are turning to the ai too much and possibly not using their own brain and if the system possibly goes down their possibly in crisis, possibly. Ai is a tool and should possibly be used responsibly as a tool, I feel.

I would very much prefer to be with ai rother than human

Most people can’t even speak and understand english, lol.

🌏↘🕳😂😂😂😂

I just hope and wish, 'human beings' will heed the warnings of the movie, 'WALL-E'.

Is this woman familiar with men and women not dating. Along with many people having not had intercourse or a girlfriend under the age of 30.

23:15 "explain to me how it's going to create profit for businesses" AI isn't being developed to make life better, it's being created to take more money from people and expand the gap between the 1% and the rest of us!

I do wonder if the whole sam altman issue last year relates to pushing for a "HER" like AI and the ethical debate over it, and wanting to use Scarlett Johansen's voice (or another voice actress) and the social risks it carries

There are million of basic mistake, and making up answer that they couldn't be fixed

It's called: "The Cat!"

That woman has a business model, her book is reliant on AI and her negative views. She's used 1 single case of a suicide from someone who clearly was schizophrenic. People die every second, from all kinds of things, using AI is bad for a cherry picked extreme case is very dumb. Saying a voice is sexy = wrong is also dumb, are we going to get AI voice shaming now? Can men not be allowed to have certain voices by these kind of rigid minded behind the times women? What about people who care literally unable to have a physical relationship, go outdoors or whatever…they should be not allowed because of sceptical and all or nothing minds like that woman, making it all about men becoming unable to socialise or be in a relationship because they're use to crafting perfection for themselves. It's idiotic and she has a very negative opinion of mens intelligence, adaptability and ability to evolve and have multiple perspectives and reasoning. The whole this is pure idiocy.

Dating and relationships are waste in my opinion, being single is great. Seems to me relationships seldom work for long anyway, or does anyone get along in general, least in the US. Bring on the AI relationships and see if they will start divorce proceedings also. 😊

Watching this guy host a show about AI, is like watching my Gran using Photoshop for the first time.

That guy who took his live is a dumb as with 0% IQ

It scrapes content from the internet, makes a stew of it, and serves it up to us assuming we have a less than average intelligence that will let it get away with this.