Laurence Fox told to pay £180,000 in libel damages | BBC News

share



Laurence Fox has been ordered to pay £90,000 in damages each to two people he referred to as “paedophiles”.

the actor-turned-politician from the UK lost a High Court libel case with Simon Blake, a former trustee for charity Stonewall, and drag artist Crystal.

The remarks on X, formerly Twitter, came in an exchange about a UK supermarket Sainsbury’s marking Black History Month.

Mrs Justice Collins Rice said the comments were “gross, groundless and indefensible”.

Subscribe here:

For more news, analysis and features visit: www.bbc.com/news

#BBCNews

source

share

← Previous post

Next post →

34 Comments

  1. Ban tranny drag shows at children's parties

  2. Isn't this the guy who called LF a racist?

  3. America is mass producing these white cu.c.ks. now this country is full of them. I'm not religious at all, but they had banning days for a reason !

  4. Could not happen to a nastier piece of crap.

  5. He can pay it from his recording royalties…. check him out singing a few years ago on a live programme… 😂 One of the funniest things I have heard in a long time. Truly awful but so funny.

  6. Lawrence is such a lad.

  7. Who actually would get the money?

  8. Poor Laurence must deal with such rubbish. Free speech is all about saying what you do not like.

  9. Seriously what’s happened to free speech? Obviously he should not call anyone these sort of names because it isn’t right!

  10. Accusing someone of being something without actual proof is career ruining and Laurence Fox accuse someone of being a paedophile because he is gay when most paedophiles are straight men.

  11. Whatever happened to "sticks and stones…" Looks like mass insanity to me. People insult each other all the time. Ban American misuse of Law in Britain.

  12. How the Fuck did Laurence Damage that Bloke. Laurence lost his Career this Berk didn't.

  13. BBC – Britain's Biggest Comedy.
    Laurence Fox – One of the few voices of reason that coming out of your dying country.

  14. Fox is an entitled little upstart wandering the streets gathering up the unprincipled being blown along the gutter by an ill wind.

  15. I'd still keep a close eye on him.

  16. Disgraceful excuse for a human being. Society is spiraling down the sewer.

  17. But he could be a danger to children, because he is deviating from the normal natural
    Way humans have evolved so he would in fact be a huge danger to humanity as these ways and ideas are taking hold and attracting more and more children. That is the truth so you can't take legal action against that. You would have to prove he is not a danger and if you can't then I could probably sue you if I was that way inclined

  18. You can insult a British diver who is a hero & happens to be straight by calling them a kids fairy, but dare say it to a different demographic & you get ripped to shredds.,….funny how these courts never seem to defend equally! if you are part of the alphabetical crew, Islamic Religion, minority groups or illegal immigrants then congratulations on living in the UK as you have won any.court case before you even get out your bed!

  19. Meanwhile real pâedöphîles walk free

  20. laurence fox
    you are not special —
    spreading vitriol
    is not ok. dehumanizing is wrong.

  21. Guess time will tell

  22. I see this as a political attack on the right wing. Libel is not ushually deployed in this way.
    That said it was a wrong thing to say about someone not guilty of such a horrible crime.
    I doubt it has caused £180000 of damage to this person.
    Law is being distorted and weaponised.

  23. The BBC has been more than happy to give Lawrence Fox a platform in the past helping to build his image.

  24. Detest this dishonest ignorant loud mouthed brat.

  25. Laurence Fox is a joke😁

  26. It's all ok for this freak to call Laurence Fox a trancephobic racist..

  27. All nonces including the BBC

  28. What a joke
    Give them nothing

  29. Warning shot to everyone who speaks out in the culture wars. Lawfare can and will be used.

  30. Fox is absolutely vile, i wonder what his dad would have said? 🤔

  31. BBC as usual not giving the whole story or both sides. Fox was called a "racist" and lost his career, how about BBC showing all the news.

  32. “I totally disagree with that because the correct term is actually hebephile“. He later clarified.

  33. Ill just say, looking at this fella, i can see what they mean

  34. We should ALL be concerned as to why our national broadcaster covers this story and excludes the whole context. Fox was responding to the slur of being labelled 'racist' by these people by replying with what he felt was an equally damaging slur. Is this journalistic ineptitude or political bias?

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.